}
|
Washington Post writer Robin Givhan made a snotty column out of Vice President Cheney's attire when he attended ceremonies in Auschwitz. Her remark that that vice president "was dressed in the kind of attire one typically wears to operate a snow blower" was a bit much for someone who doesn't know what a snow blower is and who is sitting behind a desk in a warm room in Washington. The Vice President has a a bad heart and I would think keeping warm would be a priority over being fashionable.
I looked at Peter and asked the doctor: ''Is it possible to get rid of one of them? Or two of them?'' The obstetrician wasn't an expert in selective reduction, but she knew that with a shot of potassium chloride you could eliminate one or more.
Producers will try to fit person to part in 'Vagina Monologues'These people are our leaders of tomorrow?Protests about unrepresented women in last year's play led to a reworking of the casting process
Gabe Bradley
News Freelance Editor
December 01, 2004
The ASUO Women's Center is reworking the casting process for this year's production of "The Vagina Monologues" in response to protests that last year's production underrepresented various communities of women.
Instead of holding auditions, the producers will solicit nominations from several student groups, as well as the Women's and Gender Studies Program, to assemble a potential cast. The final casting decision will be made by a volunteer selection committee.
"The queer community, the women of color community and the plus-size community did not feel represented last year," producer Nicole Pete said.
In addition to securing a more diverse cast, the selection committee will also be looking to include activists and community members who are involved with women's issues.
Pete said the committee will select people who are "not necessarily drama-oriented" in favor of "people who work (toward) 'The Vagina Monologues' mission of ending violence against women."
Women's Center spokeswoman Stefanie Loh said the de-emphasis on acting ability will provide a "down to earth" feel to the production as well as allow the producers to be more inclusive in their casting.
"The fact that they had auditions means that some people are automatically excluded," she said.
The primary concern of the selection committee will be "fitting the person to the part," Pete said, adding that all parts in the script calling for women of color will be played by women of color.
"That was one of the big concerns last year was that a white woman portrayed a woman of color," Pete said.
It will be more difficult to ensure that women who identify with the queer community participate in the production.
"That's where it gets kind of tricky," Pete said. "I don't think we can legally ask anyone what their sexual orientation is."
Instead, the producers will inform a potential actor that a particular part is a "queer role" and ask, "Do you feel that this represents you?"
About 10 people showed up at a Friday performance of "Monologues" in February with duct tape across their lips, wearing shirts with hand-written messages and passing out flyers protesting the performance.
"The biggest problem people had last year was not the production itself, but how the production was handled," Pete said.
In a post-production discussion group, participants discussed ways the production could have been done differently.
"We thought about not doing it again," Pete said.
The decision to perform the play again this year was made in the context of a larger change in direction at the Women's Center.
"Last year we got a rep for being white-centric, and people didn't feel involved," Loh said.
When Erin O'Brien took over as the new director of the Women's Center at the beginning of the 2004-05 academic year, the center set about to reform its image, Loh said.
"We knew that if we did it again this year, we'd have to change it," Pete said.
The final nominations for cast members are due Dec. 10. The cast will be announced at the beginning of winter term.
Maureen Dowd, yes that Maureen Dowd, has a brother Kevin who, in an email to his friends, wrote:
"Now, just as four years ago, I breathe a huge sigh of relief and rejoice in the common sense of the American voting public. Congratulations to President Bush for winning re-election in a poker game played with a stacked deck. No candidate, including Richard Nixon, ever had to endure the biased and unfair tactics of our major media in their attempt to influence the outcome of an election. ... He never complained, just systematically set about delivering the same consistent message. You may remember that four years ago, I felt physically ill watching the Democrats try to legislate their way to the presidency. ...The Evil Dowd put the letter in her column for some reason. To embarrass her conservative brother Kevin? To give NE liberals a chance to chuckle at an intelligent Dowd for a change? Who knows? I think the letter is perfect. The New York Times editors probably had to wash their hands after handling the copy that contained what Kevin wrote.A very big thank you to Michael Moore, Susan Sarandon, Rob Reiner, Bill Maher, Barbra Streisand, Alec Baldwin, Al Franken and Jon Stewart for your involvement. You certainly energized the base. Now, please have the courage of your convictions and leave the country.
To Bob Shrum - Cut your fee.
To Mike McCurry, Joe Lockhart and Paul Begala - You don't seem quite as smart without a great candidate.
To The New York Times and The Washington Post - If Bush and Reagan were so stupid, how did they both go four for four in elections involving two of our biggest states and the presidency without your endorsement?
We do not live in a secular country. There are all sorts of people of faith that place moral values over personal freedoms. They are not all 'wacky evangelicals.' They are people who don't like Howard Stern piping a hard porn show over the airwaves and wrapping himself in the freedom of the First Amendment. They don't like being told that a young girl does not have to seek her mother's counsel about an abortion. They don't like seeing an eight-month-old fetus having his head punctured and his brains sucked out. They don't like being told the Pledge of Allegiance, a moment of silent prayer and the words 'under God' are offensive to an enlightened few so nobody should be allowed to use them. ... My wife and I picked our sons' schools based on three criteria: 1) moral values 2) discipline 3) religious maintenance - in that order. We have spent an obscene amount of money doing this and never regretted a penny. Last week on the news, I heard that the Montgomery County school board voted to include a class with a 10th-grade girl demonstrating how to put a condom on a cucumber and a study of the homosexual lifestyle. The vote was 6-0. I feel better about the money all the time.
To Dan Rather - Good luck in your retirement.
To Gavin Newsom - Thanks for all of the great shots of the San Francisco couples embracing their mates at City Hall in direct defiance of the law.
To P. Diddy - 'Vote or Die' might need a little work.
To John Edwards - Thanks for being there.
To my friends - only 1,460 days until the next election. Stay vigilant. The Democrats, CBS, the NY Times and the Post may think Hillary is the perfect antidote for all those 'stupid' voters out there."
"Now, just as four years ago, I breathe a huge sigh of relief and rejoice in the common sense of the American voting public. Congratulations to President Bush for winning re-election in a poker game played with a stacked deck. No candidate, including Richard Nixon, ever had to endure the biased and unfair tactics of our major media in their attempt to influence the outcome of an election. ... He never complained, just systematically set about delivering the same consistent message. You may remember that four years ago, I felt physically ill watching the Democrats try to legislate their way to the presidency. ... A very big thank you to Michael Moore, Susan Sarandon, Rob Reiner, Bill Maher, Barbra Streisand, Alec Baldwin, Al Franken and Jon Stewart for your involvement. You certainly energized the base. Now, please have the courage of your convictions and leave the country. To Bob Shrum - Cut your fee. To Mike McCurry, Joe Lockhart and Paul Begala - You don't seem quite as smart without a great candidate. To The New York Times and The Washington Post - If Bush and Reagan were so stupid, how did they both go four for four in elections involving two of our biggest states and the presidency without your endorsement? We do not live in a secular country. There are all sorts of people of faith that place moral values over personal freedoms. They are not all 'wacky evangelicals.' They are people who don't like Howard Stern piping a hard porn show over the airwaves and wrapping himself in the freedom of the First Amendment. They don't like being told that a young girl does not have to seek her mother's counsel about an abortion. They don't like seeing an eight-month-old fetus having his head punctured and his brains sucked out. They don't like being told the Pledge of Allegiance, a moment of silent prayer and the words 'under God' are offensive to an enlightened few so nobody should be allowed to use them. ... My wife and I picked our sons' schools based on three criteria: 1) moral values 2) discipline 3) religious maintenance - in that order. We have spent an obscene amount of money doing this and never regretted a penny. Last week on the news, I heard that the Montgomery County school board voted to include a class with a 10th-grade girl demonstrating how to put a condom on a cucumber and a study of the homosexual lifestyle. The vote was 6-0. I feel better about the money all the time. To Dan Rather - Good luck in your retirement. To Gavin Newsom - Thanks for all of the great shots of the San Francisco couples embracing their mates at City Hall in direct defiance of the law. To P. Diddy - 'Vote or Die' might need a little work. To John Edwards - Thanks for being there. To my friends - only 1,460 days until the next election. Stay vigilant. The Democrats, CBS, the NY Times and the Post may think Hillary is the perfect antidote for all those 'stupid' voters out there."The Evil Dowd put the letter in her column for some reason. To embarrass her conservative brother Kevin? To give NE liberals a chance to chuckle at an intelligent Dowd for a change? Who knows? I think the letter is perfect. The New York Times editors probably had to wash their hands after handling the copy that contained what Kevin wrote.
Cpl Mitchell is a squad leader. He was wounded as his squad was clearing a house when some enemy threw pineapple grenades down on top of them. As he was getting triaged, the doctor told him that he had been shot through the arm. Cpl Mitchell told the doctor that he had actually been shot "a couple of days ago" and had given himself self aide on the wound. When the doctor got on him about not coming off the line, he firmly told the doctor that he was a squad leader and did not have time to get treated as his men were still fighting. There are a number of Marines who have been wounded multiple times but refuse to leave their fellow Marines. It is incredibly humbling to walk among such men. They fought as hard as any Marines in history and deserve to be remembered as such. The enemy they fought burrowed into houses and fired through mouse holes cut in walls, lured them into houses rigged with explosives and detonated the houses on pursuing Marines, and actually hid behind surrender flags only to engage the Marines with small arms fire once they perceived that the Marines had let their guard down. I know of several instances where near dead enemy rolled grenades out on Marines who were preparing to render them aid. It was a fight to the finish in every sense and the Marines delivered.What I did in the Marines a long time ago was hard for me but nothing like what these guys in Iraq are going through. They deserve our love, thanks, and respect.
"As a CBS News correspondent in the early '80s, I worked with Rather and have known him for more than 20 years. Listen to me: There is no way on this Earth that he would have knowingly used fake documents on any story. It may be true that Rather did not vet the information supplied to him by producers, but few anchor people do. They are dependent on other journalists, and this is a huge flaw in the system. Dan Rather is guilty of not being skeptical enough about a story that was politically loaded. "O'Reilly, probably because he has known Rather for 20 years, didn't, as the countryboy Dan might say, plow this ground deep enough. The question O'Reilly should be asking is why didn't Rather vet the information. Given Rather's liberal bias and probable absolute glee at finding something, however tainted, that would shoot down the Bush campaign Rather didn't vet the information because he wanted to believe it was true or thought that he could slide the slime on by the American people wrapped in his aura of respectability. The information loosely fit right in with his and, as the backwoods Dan would say, other dogs' sniffing this trail, preconceived notions about Bush's TANG service so he wrapped it, packaged it, and served it to the unsuspecting public as "news".
Dan Rather did not get what he deserved in this case. He made a mistake, as we all do, but he is not a dishonest man. Unfair freedom of speech did him in. This is not your grandfather's country anymore.I agree with O'Reilly here. Rather didn't get what he deserved. He should have been fired. If he made a simple mistake, he made a mistake an honest cub reporter shouldn't have made. It is pretty obvious what was going on in the See-BS News offices and it wasn't a mistake. Dan Rather abused his right to freedom of speech to say what he wanted to say in order to affect a national election. My grandfather would have laughed in Dan Rather's face after kicking his butt.